|
LikORish-Spider
|
 |
« on: January 22, 2009, 12:35:13 PM » |
|
I watched the season premier tonight.
Very interesting.
Anyone else?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
grecopa
|
|
« Reply #1 on: January 23, 2009, 08:24:05 PM » |
|
I'm halfway through it. I got too tired and had to record the rest, but I'll watch it tonight. Phil kept trying to ask me questions about the show. If you haven't seen it by now you really can't catch up at this piont.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
tialessa
|
|
« Reply #2 on: January 23, 2009, 09:34:35 PM » |
|
ABC has all the episodes online.... perhaps if he watched all the catchup episodes (at least one per season) it would help a little...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
grecopa
|
|
« Reply #3 on: January 24, 2009, 11:04:47 AM » |
|
He's not really interested, he was just trying to get on my nerves.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Roz
|
|
« Reply #4 on: February 04, 2009, 03:12:04 AM » |
|
OOOOOhhhhhhh so I'm back up to date, or at least to ep 3 (am I up to date?) - and it's a real whistlestop tour. I'm loving it, but far fetched doesn't even begin to cover it....  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
HPfamily
|
|
« Reply #5 on: February 04, 2009, 09:30:34 AM » |
|
Yep!! You're up to date!! So much to and fro...I get a little LOST....heh!!!  aaaaaaaaaaahhhh...I kill me!!!  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Sharon
|
|
« Reply #6 on: February 10, 2009, 01:36:40 AM » |
|
Since everyone seems to be on the same episode I think I am safe to put forward a theory Bogleg has come up with. Penny and Desmond have a son named Charlie, named after the now drowned hobbit. However what if that little boy is in fact Charlie Pace? Boggy thinks that somehow the baby will go back in time, grow up into a junky rocker, befriend Desmond on a mysterious island and eventually croak it, leading to Desmond naming his first born after his bestest friend! Ahh the never ending circle of time travel I personally am more interested in any theories on Richard - why doesn't he leap in time, why is he so old, why does he wear more eyeliner than Russell Brand  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Roz
|
|
« Reply #7 on: February 10, 2009, 03:12:15 AM » |
|
Oroboros?
I like it!
I'm also fascinated by Richard who I seemed to notice very early on looked the same through time... (not bad looking either! Despite the 'guyliner') *ahem*
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
tialessa
|
|
« Reply #8 on: February 10, 2009, 08:17:57 PM » |
|
According to the Lost crew (forget where I read it in the last couple of weeks - E! Online/Kristin, TV Guide News, Entertainment Weekly/Michael Ausiello or Doc Jensen), they use ZERO eyeliner on Richard (Nestor Carbonell).
I was SO excited to see another survivor in "the Lost Prince". If there hadn't been a sleeping kitty in my lap I would have jumped up to do a happy dance. As it was I clapped & laughed enough to wake said kitty up (she gave me SUCH a dirty look)...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
kbmum
|
|
« Reply #9 on: February 10, 2009, 08:31:39 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bryanjs14
|
|
« Reply #10 on: February 11, 2009, 10:27:53 PM » |
|
Was I the only one that never for a second believed that the survivor revealed last week was actually dead? I remember watching the finale last year and saying...nope, no way. he's fine.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
tialessa
|
|
« Reply #11 on: February 12, 2009, 03:20:55 AM » |
|
Was I the only one that never for a second believed that the survivor revealed last week was actually dead? I remember watching the finale last year and saying...nope, no way. he's fine. I wasn't going to believe it until there was a body.... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Sharon
|
|
« Reply #12 on: February 13, 2009, 01:35:58 AM » |
|
Thanks for the link Cindy. One of our senior politicians has the same type of eyelashes and took a lot of stick when he appeared on Question Time. Was I the only one that never for a second believed that the survivor revealed last week was actually dead? I remember watching the finale last year and saying...nope, no way. he's fine.
I never suspected  . Do you thinks anyone else survived? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Roz
|
|
« Reply #13 on: February 16, 2009, 01:22:06 AM » |
|
Nope, neither did I suspect that we still had one more 'survivor' all alone coping with the time flashes etc.
I read this page before I'd caught the last ep & was totally confused!!
So... anyone else think that LOST is back on and hot again? I'm really enjoying it anyway. I think it's become more and more far fetched and mad than ever, but it's still very good. I daresay it's just a little too long, intricately weaved and involved now... 6 series in all... crumbs!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bryanjs14
|
|
« Reply #14 on: February 16, 2009, 02:26:10 AM » |
|
Yeah I just figured the blast blew him into the water somewhere. He WAS on the back of the boat and the explosion came from the front.
I am loving this season. I would definitely say lost is back...last weeks episodes had more than a few WTF moments and I loved it
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Roz
|
|
« Reply #15 on: February 16, 2009, 03:02:09 AM » |
|
In the UK, many of our series are quite short. A standard BBC programme is probably just 6-8 episodes long. It's enough to draw you in but also enough to leave you wanting more... what do you guys think to that? Don't get me wrong, I'm loving LOST, but would I watch the entire series over again? Possibly not... (hmm, maybe if I got Blu Ray ). But would I watch 5/6 seasons time and again if they were just 6-8 eps long? Yes probably... Any thoughts? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
