|
Tower
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: May 04, 2005, 05:04:22 AM » |
|
If i would have to bet, i would say, it will be a Double Auto.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Anna
|
|
« Reply #21 on: May 04, 2005, 06:37:34 AM » |
|
If i would have to bet, i would say, it will be a Double Auto. I think it'll be a Double Auto too. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
thor
|
|
« Reply #22 on: May 04, 2005, 06:52:59 AM » |
|
I think it'll be a Double Auto too. I hope they are seperate autographs and not a Dual auto  I bought my first and only Dual Auto for SG1 and that cost enough, I would hate to guess the price this one would be  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Tower
|
|
« Reply #23 on: May 05, 2005, 01:19:03 AM » |
|
I was playing again a little bit.  Unfortunately there wasn't a suitable source to copy it with good quality.  I think, the card everybody talks about could look like this way. I would definately choose this screenshot of the movie for the card.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
EmmasOneandOnly
Guest
|
|
« Reply #24 on: May 05, 2005, 01:28:46 AM » |
|
Nice replica.
How much do you think think this card will go for on EBay I mean the Whomping Willow and Monster book of Monsters is under $200 and they are 25 case cards!!!
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: May 05, 2005, 01:40:39 AM by EmmasOneandOnly »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Tower
|
|
« Reply #25 on: May 05, 2005, 01:39:35 AM » |
|
It depends how the cards are limited. You can compare it with the Pear Tree Leaves in my opinion. If this set is really as attractive as the POA set. If not, i will sell below the PTL price.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: May 05, 2005, 01:39:56 AM by Tower »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
grecopa
|
|
« Reply #26 on: May 05, 2005, 01:46:08 AM » |
|
Does anyone have an idea of how Artbox will do the Sorcerers stone insert? It seems to me that a small flat cut of it would be really breakable. I wonder if the stone was really some sort of plastic?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Tower
|
|
« Reply #27 on: May 05, 2005, 01:49:59 AM » |
|
I wonder if the stone was really some sort of plastic? I can't imagine anything else. I would bet, it is. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
EmmasOneandOnly
Guest
|
|
« Reply #28 on: May 05, 2005, 01:52:14 AM » |
|
It seamed kind of solid when Harry dropped it...or they could have inserted that as a sound. I'm sure you can shave it down and there has to be thousands because I think you could like only get about 5 cards out of one stone  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EmmasOneandOnly
Guest
|
|
« Reply #30 on: May 05, 2005, 02:02:55 AM » |
|
Oh, I forgot about that. They "distroyed" it. Ok, everyone who gets a piece of the Stone. Guard it. With Voldemort coming to life in six months he'll still try to look for it so he can turn any metal into pure gold . I warned you |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Morningangel-Iola
|
|
« Reply #31 on: May 05, 2005, 02:44:43 AM » |
|
Oh, I forgot about that. They "distroyed" it. Ok, everyone who gets a piece of the Stone. Guard it. With Voldemort coming to life in six months he'll still try to look for it so he can turn any metal into pure gold . I warned you And become (more?) immortal |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
EmmasOneandOnly
Guest
|
|
« Reply #32 on: May 05, 2005, 03:02:34 AM » |
|
How thick do you think the school book cards will be? I mean old books like in Hogwarts Library arnt that thin |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
kbmum
|
|
« Reply #33 on: May 05, 2005, 03:10:02 AM » |
|
The school books might be like the Unfogging the Future prop - just the book cover, so the swatch would be thin.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
EmmasOneandOnly
Guest
|
|
« Reply #34 on: May 05, 2005, 03:12:54 AM » |
|
But did you see the restriced section books. They had no book cover. I wouldnt mind having a piece of the page since there might be some really cool varients but...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
LikORish-Spider
|
|
« Reply #35 on: May 05, 2005, 03:19:15 AM » |
|
The Invisibility Cloak would make a nice Prop card.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
EmmasOneandOnly
Guest
|
|
« Reply #36 on: May 05, 2005, 03:28:57 AM » |
|
Is that a confirmed one because I want one of those too :'(
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Tower
|
|
« Reply #37 on: May 05, 2005, 03:41:00 AM » |
|
He is just kidding. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
kbmum
|
|
« Reply #38 on: May 06, 2005, 10:55:53 PM » |
|
I got an email this morning from Artbox about the James and Lily autos:
We have James and Lily Potter, but they're not a dual card.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Anna
|
|
« Reply #39 on: May 06, 2005, 11:02:03 PM » |
|
We have James and Lily Potter, but they're not a dual card.
Yah! That means they won't be too expensive to get them. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
