|
: Low number vs High Number : beckham1 September 23, 2004, 10:32:05 AM Can someone explain to me why a costume card # low is perceived by some to be more valuable than one #'d high?
I don't understand this concept and would think who cares what number it is in the run unless it is a variant? Why would 50/1000 be worth more than 930/1000? Doesn't make any sense to me.... : Re:Low number vs High Number : Roz September 23, 2004, 03:31:59 PM It doesn't bother me. But if I am given a choice I'd go for 50/1500 rather than 48/1500, simply because it's a nicer number!! Mind you once it's in my folder I am not bothered whether it's 1/500 or 237/500...
: Re:Low number vs High Number : kbmum September 23, 2004, 05:36:49 PM It's sort of a tradition with collectibles that a low number is more valuable. It doesn't matter whether the item is a trading card or a statute or a lithograph. I think collectors naturally gravitate toward the low number, but also dealers perpetuate the idea because it allows them to charge more for an item.
: Re:Low number vs High Number : ferdinand_the_yak September 23, 2004, 06:21:15 PM Its like the obsession with earlier editions of books - a 1997 1st ed copy of Philosopher Stone can fetch up to $25 000 whereas the 60th edition that is in your local bookstore costs $15 and has exactly the same words :)
: Re:Low number vs High Number : rns91294 September 30, 2004, 11:03:23 PM I say, if you have a choice, go for the one with the card number that maybe means something personally to you. Especially if you do not plan on reselling.
: Re:Low number vs High Number : chico October 01, 2004, 07:15:28 AM Just to be a little different, has anyone ever seen a costume or prop card which was a number 1/??? What is the lowest # you have of any costume/prop card?
: Re:Low number vs High Number : Elle_driver October 01, 2004, 09:26:20 AM i think artbox may have kept the #1/*** for like display purposes at shows or for just in case someone gets a faulty/damaged card, because i've seen like 900/900 and other last numbers, but no first numbers, hmmm
: Re:Low number vs High Number : Roz October 01, 2004, 01:49:07 PM Yes, I agree. I think it's unlikely we will ever see 1/___ they WILL be kept!
I think that's why the ones that are 200/200 etc go for so much - about 30% extra from my observation I believe Darren has peartree card number 4, and that's the lowest number I have heard of, the next one was the 15/30 peartree ;) : Re:Low number vs High Number : chico October 01, 2004, 08:38:13 PM YES, I know...I just received my 200/200 Daily Prophet prop card from Olly....it's a beauty. The only reason to go for the high numbers is that the low ones never appear. My best low is a 14/750 Harry's Robe. It would be nice to get some first 10 ones but I imagine the cost would be even more than the last ones.
|