|
: Academy Awards!! : Trey February 28, 2005, 09:34:49 AM Well well, the Academy Awards (Oscars) have started and I must say, it is shaping up to be a great awards night!
SPOILERS AHEAD!! If you do not want to know who has won then do not read on further! * ** *** **** ***** ****** ******* ******** Achievement in Art Direction - The Aviator Best Supporting Actor - Morgan Freeman (Million Dollar Baby) Best Animated Film - The Incredibles Best Makeup - Lemony Snickets Series of Unfortunate Events Costume Design - Sandy Powell (The Aviator) Best Supporting Actress - Cate Blanchett (The Aviator) Best Feature Documentary - Born in Brothels Best Film Editing - The Aviator Best Adapted Screenplay - Alexander Payne and Jim Taylor (Sideways) Visual Effects - Spiderman 2 Best Short Film Live - WASP Best Short Film Animated - Ryan Cinemetography - The Aviator Sound Mixing - Ray Sound Editing - The Incredibles Well that is as up-to-date as I can get it for the moment, but I will be back with updates....... I am sooo glad that Cate Blanchett won, now all I need is for Johnny Depp to win best actor and I will be a happy person ;D : Re:Academy Awards!! : ferdinand_the_yak February 28, 2005, 09:37:10 AM I am so glad that the Aviator has done so well - and that Cate finally got her long deserved Oscar ;D ;D ;D How the HELL did Gwyneth Paltrow beat her in 1998 - Cate was loads better :P
Fingers crossed for Johnny now! :) : Re:Academy Awards!! : Trey February 28, 2005, 09:39:13 AM How the HELL did Gwyneth Paltrow beat her in 1998 - Cate was loads better :P I have no idea, it is a shame really but at least now she has been recognised :D Go Johnny, Go Johnny yea yea Go Johnny :P : Re:Academy Awards!! : ferdinand_the_yak February 28, 2005, 09:47:11 AM D'you know when the big awrds will be announced? I know its at the end of the program, but what time will that be? And is it being broadcast tonight at all on free to air TV in Aus?
: Re:Academy Awards!! : Trey February 28, 2005, 09:51:58 AM The big ones are coming up soon I would think.......I will keep this updated as long as I can. It is on tonight on Chanel 7 from 8pm (Melbourne Time)
: Re:Academy Awards!! : Trey February 28, 2005, 09:52:49 AM Woops my mistake, it is channel 9....
: Re:Academy Awards!! : Trey February 28, 2005, 09:53:52 AM Another update:
Best Original Score - Finding Neverland : Re:Academy Awards!! : Trey February 28, 2005, 10:06:57 AM Best Original Song - Al Otro Lado Del Rio (The Motorcycle Diaries)
: Re:Academy Awards!! : Trey February 28, 2005, 10:14:40 AM Best Actress - Hilary Swank (Million Dollar Baby)
: Re:Academy Awards!! : ferdinand_the_yak February 28, 2005, 10:18:41 AM Oooh - Best actor is coming up then! And best movie! :o
: Re:Academy Awards!! : Trey February 28, 2005, 10:19:17 AM Foreign Language Film - The Sea Inside
hmmm I dont know why I am updating this cause there is no one logged on except myself and FTY....oh well : Re:Academy Awards!! : ferdinand_the_yak February 28, 2005, 10:21:42 AM LOL ;D
I appreciate the updates ;) : Re:Academy Awards!! : Trey February 28, 2005, 10:22:38 AM Writing (Original Screenplay) - Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind - Charlie Kaufman
: Re:Academy Awards!! : ferdinand_the_yak February 28, 2005, 10:26:35 AM Oooh - that's good, Eternal Sunshine deserved something for sure! Fabulous movie and brilliant screenplay ;D
Only the big 3 left now - actor, movie and director :-X : Re:Academy Awards!! : Trey February 28, 2005, 10:27:43 AM Best Actor - Jamie Foxx (Ray)
:'( *Trey cries hysterically* That one was mean't to go to Johnny :'( : Re:Academy Awards!! : ferdinand_the_yak February 28, 2005, 10:28:47 AM :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'(
THAT was an upset! Fingers crossed for best picture! : Re:Academy Awards!! : Trey February 28, 2005, 10:30:50 AM :'( :'( :'( :'( :'(
: Re:Academy Awards!! : Trey February 28, 2005, 10:36:31 AM Best Director - Clint Eastwood (Million Dollar Baby)
: Re:Academy Awards!! : ferdinand_the_yak February 28, 2005, 10:37:18 AM The Holy Grail is left :o
It was sooooooooo much easier last year ;) : Re:Academy Awards!! : Trey February 28, 2005, 10:40:23 AM Best Picture - Million Dollar Baby
: Re:Academy Awards!! : ferdinand_the_yak February 28, 2005, 10:40:50 AM *sighs* :-[
Ah well, there is always next year! : Re:Academy Awards!! : Trey February 28, 2005, 10:43:47 AM I am disappointed that Finding Neverland didnt get best picture, it was the BEST movie I have seen in a long time.....well I will have to see million dollar baby now and see what all this hype is about ;)
Well apart from Cate winning I was a bit disappointed with that :( : Re:Academy Awards!! : EmmasOneandOnly February 28, 2005, 11:05:02 AM HHHHAAAAAAARRRRRRRYYYYYY :'( :'( :'(
: Re:Academy Awards!! : MakTheYak February 28, 2005, 02:36:35 PM What's this Million Dollar Baby thing? I haven't seen it and I've heard absolutely nothing about it. Was it good?
: Re:Academy Awards!! : savage727 February 28, 2005, 10:13:04 PM Clint Eastwood directed Million Dollar Baby and it is a story about a female boxer and what happens to her. Hillary Swank plays the boxer and she won Best Actress for her performance. Morgan Freeman won Best Supporting Actor for his role as a retired boxer who helps her. The movie won Best Picture and Best Director as well so to answer you question Mark - yes it is good! :)
: Re:Academy Awards!! : Trey March 01, 2005, 04:15:31 AM I am yet to see it either Mark.........I dont get what the hype is all about, I have heard both good and bad reviews.......I think I may have to see it for myself to know if it is really good or not ::)
: Re:Academy Awards!! : ferdinand_the_yak March 01, 2005, 04:32:35 AM Looks like we will have to.. but I don't think we will like it as much (well, Trey and I anyway!) than if it wasn't competing against 'Finding Neverland'!
: Re:Academy Awards!! : Trey March 01, 2005, 04:33:59 AM Looks like we will have to.. but I don't think we will like it as much (well, Trey and I anyway!) than if it wasn't competing against 'Finding Neverland'! EXACTLY ;) : Re:Academy Awards!! : Morningangel-Iola March 01, 2005, 04:58:57 AM I've never even heard of this Million dollar baby.
And why does Harry never get anywhere? Too many Brits in it for them? Do they not like that? : Re:Academy Awards!! : savage727 March 01, 2005, 08:24:35 PM Voting for who gets Academy Awards has nothing to due with if there are too many Brits in a picture! There are many Brit Actors and Pictures that have won Oscars. Have you ever seen "Chariots of Fire" or "Bridge on the River Kwai" to name just two? You have to understand who gets to vote for the awards - Film Directors, Actors, Film Critics, and for the technical side of motion picture making it is the technical folks themselves. For the most part Harry Potter movies do not compare in the minds of the voters to what they see as dramatic motion pictures. The Lord of the Rings movies have started to change people's minds who do the voting and that is a start.
: Re:Academy Awards!! : Morningangel-Iola March 01, 2005, 08:28:50 PM It is all very artsy and its not what gets 'bums on seats'. I do think it was telling with the BAFTAs (UK awards) that when the papers and stuff where listing who won what they missed out the Orange film of the year (POA) which was actually voted for by the people that go to see films.
: Re:Academy Awards!! : Roz March 01, 2005, 08:31:46 PM That's true!! But to be fair the Oscars do get us to watch some films we might have missed out on otherwise - masterpieces that have slipped by us un-noticed.
I can't remember which award it was - was it Empire?? The most respected film magazine here in the UK awarded Andy Serkis their best actor award last year - (no not pandering to Sean Penn who's OK but he hadn't had the amazing year and given the amazing performances that Serkis had;)) I think Andy Serkis nearly died of joy and pride... and I think he might well have broken down :) : Re:Academy Awards!! : Roz March 01, 2005, 08:45:46 PM I've done some digging.
Apparently He (Andy Serkis) was ruled ineligible for a Best Supporting Actor nomination at the 2003 Academy Awards because his character Gollum in Lord of the Rings onscreen was computer generated. And yes it was Empire who voted Serkis their number one: http://news.bbc.co.uk/cbbcnews/hi/tv_film/newsid_3461000/3461045.stm (hee CBBC - quality reporting there :P) : Re:Academy Awards!! : ferdinand_the_yak March 01, 2005, 11:48:32 PM I don't know whether any of you watched the ceremony, but Chris Rock went out to the dtreets of Hollywood to ask the everyda person about the movies. None of the people he spoke to had actually seen any of the movies nominated for best picture!
: Re:Academy Awards!! : Morningangel-Iola March 02, 2005, 03:11:31 AM I don't know whether any of you watched the ceremony, but Chris Rock went out to the dtreets of Hollywood to ask the everyda person about the movies. None of the people he spoke to had actually seen any of the movies nominated for best picture! ::) : Re:Academy Awards!! : Trey March 02, 2005, 04:18:23 AM He (Andy Serkis) was ruled ineligible for a Best Supporting Actor nomination at the 2003 Academy Awards because his character Gollum in Lord of the Rings onscreen was computer generated. Thats pretty unfair....I thought that there was an actor (who I presumed to be Serkis) that dressed up in a full-body white suit and actually acted as gollum, then the techo's imposed gollum (via computer) on top of this person, using their movements to create gollum........I thought this was serkis...am I incorrect? If it was him then he was jibbed of being nominated cause I would class that as acting, especially teamed up with the voicing for gollum as well. : Re:Academy Awards!! : Boggle March 02, 2005, 04:25:39 AM No, you're right! What a swizzle! >:(
|